Home » Bangalore, Delhi, Featured, Headline, Land Use, Urban Sprawl, Urbanization

Tata Gives India the “World’s Cheapest Home,” But What Does That Mean For Cities?

Submitted by David Daddio on October 22, 20096 Comments
Rendering of Tata's Shubh Giha Housing Complex in Boisar, India

Rendering of Tata's Shubh Griha Housing Complex in Boisar, India. Courtesy of Tata Housing.

Some companies seek to fill market niches, but the Tata Group is increasingly known for filling market chasms.  Tata boldly transformed the international auto industry late last year when it announced its intention to release the 115,000 rupee (US$2,500) Nano, potentially bringing car ownership within reach of millions of Indians in the coming years. Now Tata has introduced an even more ambitious project that could drastically change the Indian landscape and much of the rest of the developing world in the next decade: the 390,00 rupee (US$8,500) home. Dubbed “Nano Homes,” Tata is building one thousand 283 square-foot houses outside of Mumbai. Apparently they are not alone, according to The Globe and the Mail:

Matheran Realty, another real estate giant, plans to build 15,000 flats in the next three years in Matheran, outside Mumbai, available for about 220,000 rupees. India’s Godrej group, meanwhile, plans to build a low-cost township outside the western city of Ahmedabad, with apartments ranging from 500,000 rupees to two million rupees.

With at least 23 million urban Indian families in the middle- and lower-middle-income groups aspiring to escape slums and live in decent, affordable housing, it’s not hard see the logical conclusion of this business venture: millions of Indian families moving to the outskirts of Mumbai, Delhi, and Bangalore to take advantage of cheap and available land and the promise of a better life. According to the Mumbai-based research firm Monitor India, we could be talking about as many as 180 million Indian families, if you include rural households. If we extrapolate this to the rest of the developing world, we could be seeing a global trend towards suburbanization in the not-too-distant future.

Tata’s “Nano House” could raise the standard of living for millions of the world’s poor by pulling them out of squalid slum conditions, but like the “Nano Car,” it could drastically exacerbate mobility and pollution problems already facing dozens of cities in the developing world. That’s because cheap housing nearly always necessitates large tracts of cheap land on the outskirts of cities where developers can take advantage of the economies of scale that come with developing many houses at once. Is it any surprise that Tata and its competitors are all operating on the urban fringe?

Without an aggressive program of well thought-out dense development, integrated mass transit, and car-use demand management, the combination of cheap cars and cheap homes could create for India the same intractable land-use conditions found in every major metropolitan region in the United States since the end of World War II: ubiquitous sprawl, gridlock, loss of agricultural lands, and unheeded habitat destruction.

David Daddio

Connect with on  Connect with  on TheCityFix Social
Avatar Image Subscribe to posts from David DaddioSubscribe

Works for EMBARQ - the WRI Center for Sustainable Transport. He Co-founded RethinkCollegePark.net and is interested in multi-modal transportation, urban infill redevelopment, and regional and environmental planning.

Other posts by

Related Posts

 

6 Comments »

  • Robin says:

    Calling these high dense buildings “suburbanization” is a little far fetched considering the low square footage of the units—the reality is that they are still high dense. The real problem is not the buildings, but creating a market reality where they could be built in place of existing slums—this is probably best accomplished through appropriate transportation pricing as American Suburbs were and are fueled by cheap gas, not cheap housing.

  • Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Reddit by arunvr: I hope we get more Planned Cities because of private realtor projects. I am completely disappointed with the kind of urban planning the govt has been doing so far….

  • Thomas says:

    Didn’t we learn a long time ago that this is the exact way to create a ghetto? Although this *may* be a step up (if you research the analysis on slums)… it’s going from one bad situation to another

  • Simon says:

    Land shortage is a major issue in Mumbai. The government is keen to shift slum dwellers from central Mumbai to land on the rural-urban periphery in order to capitalise on the high land prices downtown. Some have been forced out; some larger more established slums (like Dharavi) remain. How long before these kinds of suburban developments encourage the government to shift the poorest again to make way for wealthier residents? Perhaps even further from the centre and employment.

  • Dave Brook says:

    It’s dangerous to make assumptions about India. There has been an effort in some cities to bulldoze tracts of (relatively) lower density housing and replace it with high rise housing for low income (while the developer keeps other land and profits from market rate development. From newspaper articles I’ve read this is controversial in its own right, but it means that redevelopment doesn’t necessarily increases vehicle distance.

  • randhir says:

    Dear TATA Groups,
    Please build some cheap flats in Bihar too, it will help to elevate Bihar.

    Warm Regards,
    Randhir Kumar

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <p> <br>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.